GLASTONBURY, CONNECTICUT · FAMILY LAW + FAMILY-VIOLENCE DEFENSE

Earning Capacity and Imputed Income in Connecticut Child Support

A Connecticut court is not limited to what a parent reports earning. In the right circumstances it can base support on earning capacity — what the parent is capable of earning.

Two very different people arrive at this page, and the framework serves both.

When imputation is considered

Where a parent appears to be unemployed or underemployed by choice, or where reported income does not match the life being lived. Self-employment is a common context, because income is more easily shaped.

What the court must consider first

The 2026 guidelines, at Regs. §46b-215a-5c(c), require the court to consider, to the extent known, before imputing income:

  • the parent’s assets and residence
  • employment and earnings history
  • job skills, education, and literacy
  • age and health
  • criminal record and other employment barriers
  • the record of seeking work
  • the local job market, available employers, and prevailing local earnings

The guidelines also provide that, for imputation purposes, full-time employment means 32 hours per week.

This is a meaningful constraint. A court cannot simply carry forward a prior salary because it once existed.

If you are the parent seeking imputation

The evidence is what matters: lifestyle inconsistent with reported income, business records, a history of earnings in the field, and evidence of available positions in this market at comparable pay.

For a self-employed parent, the work is in the records rather than the return — personal expenses run through the business, compensation set below market, retained earnings.

If income is being imputed to you

The factor list is your framework. A documented job search, evidence about the actual local market for your skills, health limitations, and any employment barrier the guidelines name are all directly relevant.

A career change that genuinely reduced income is different from one taken to reduce an obligation, and the distinction is provable in both directions.

TALK TO THE FIRM

Every case starts with a conversation.

Every case starts with a conversation about what you’re facing and what it would take to handle it.

2837-A Main Street, Glastonbury, CT 06033